Open main menu
Blog HomeOutrank App

Moz DA vs Ahrefs DR: The Ultimate Comparison Guide (2025)

Learn the difference between moz and ahrefs domain ranking. Compare DA vs DR and decide which SEO tool suits you best.

Table of Contents
Moz DA vs Ahrefs DR: The Ultimate Comparison Guide (2025)
Do not index
Do not index

Moz DA vs Ahrefs DR: The Ultimate Comparison Guide (2025)

In the competitive world of SEO, understanding the difference between Moz Domain Authority and Ahrefs Domain Rating is crucial for developing effective strategies. These powerful metrics help evaluate website strength and predict ranking potential, but they work in distinct ways that can significantly impact your SEO decisions.
This comprehensive guide breaks down the seven critical differences between Moz DA and Ahrefs DR, backed by the latest research and expert insights. Whether you're a digital marketer, content creator, SEO specialist, or website owner, these insights will help you leverage both metrics for maximum SEO success in 2025.

Quick Comparison: Moz DA vs Ahrefs DR at a Glance

Before diving deeper, here's a side-by-side comparison of these two influential domain metrics:
Feature
Moz Domain Authority (DA)
Ahrefs Domain Rating (DR)
Scale
1-100 (logarithmic)
0-100 (more linear)
Database Size
Smaller but quality-focused
~8 billion pages crawled daily
Link Quality Assessment
Emphasizes trustworthiness, includes Spam Score
Focuses on link power and quantity
Update Frequency
Monthly (approximately)
More frequent (estimated weekly)
Companion Metrics
Page Authority, Spam Score
URL Rating, Ahrefs Rank
Ranking Correlation
Often better for informational queries
Often better for commercial queries
Best Use Case
Overall website trustworthiness evaluation
Raw link building power assessment

1. Domain Authority vs Domain Rating: Core Metrics Explained

The first fundamental difference between Moz and Ahrefs domain ranking metrics lies in how their primary scores—Domain Authority (DA) and Domain Rating (DR)—are calculated and scaled.

Moz Domain Authority (DA)

Moz's Domain Authority operates on a logarithmic scale from 1 to 100, making it progressively harder to increase your score as you move up the scale. Improving from DA 20 to 30 requires significantly less effort than moving from DA 70 to 80.
DA incorporates multiple factors beyond just backlinks, including:
  • Link quality and relevance
  • Linking domain diversity
  • Historical link data trends
  • On-page optimization signals
  • Spam detection algorithms
  • Domain age considerations
According to Moz's documentation, "Domain Authority is calculated by evaluating multiple factors, including linking root domains and number of total links, into a single DA score. This score can then be used when comparing websites or tracking the 'ranking strength' of a website over time."

Ahrefs Domain Rating (DR)

Ahrefs' Domain Rating uses a more linear 0-100 scale and focuses more directly on the strength of a site's backlink profile. The calculation primarily considers:
  • The number of unique domains linking to your site
  • The DR scores of those linking domains
  • Whether the links are dofollow or nofollow
  • The number of unique domains each linking website links to
DR measures raw link popularity rather than incorporating a broader set of ranking signals. As Ahrefs explains: "Domain Rating shows the strength of a website's backlink profile compared to others in our database on a scale from 0 to 100, with the latter being the strongest."

Key Differences in Calculation Approach

The fundamental difference is that Moz DA attempts to model Google's algorithm more holistically, incorporating various ranking signals beyond just backlinks. In contrast, Ahrefs DR focuses almost exclusively on the strength of the backlink profile.
Ahrefs' methodology is also more transparent about how it calculates DR. While Moz provides general guidelines about DA calculation, Ahrefs offers more detailed documentation on how various factors influence DR scores.

Practical Implications

These differences have real-world implications for SEO professionals:
  1. Relative Comparisons: A DA of 50 isn't equivalent to a DR of 50. Always compare DA to DA and DR to DR, never across metrics.
  1. Growth Expectations: Due to the logarithmic scale, high-DA sites will see slower DA growth even with substantial link acquisition, while DR may continue to grow more linearly.
  1. Different Growth Patterns: A site might see its DR increase while its DA remains stagnant (or vice versa), depending on the types of links acquired and other optimization efforts.
  1. Industry Benchmarking: Some industries tend to have higher DA or DR averages than others. Always benchmark against competitors in your specific niche.
The second major difference between Moz and Ahrefs domain ranking stems from the size, comprehensiveness, and freshness of their respective backlink databases.

Ahrefs: Massive Crawling Capacity

Ahrefs boasts an impressive crawling capacity, processing approximately 8 billion pages daily. This massive scale gives them several advantages:
  • Faster link discovery: New backlinks are typically discovered and added to their index more quickly.
  • More comprehensive coverage: Their database captures a larger percentage of the web's total link graph.
  • Greater historical depth: Their extensive crawling history provides more data points for trend analysis.
According to Ahrefs' own data, their web crawler (named "AhrefsBot") is the second most active crawler after Googlebot, giving them exceptional visibility into the web's link structure.

Moz: Quality-Focused Approach

While Moz's link index is substantial, it's smaller than Ahrefs'. However, Moz emphasizes quality over sheer quantity with:
  • Stricter quality filters: More aggressive filtering of spammy or low-value links.
  • Focus on authoritative sites: Greater emphasis on crawling established, authoritative domains.
  • Link context analysis: More attention to the context in which links appear.
Moz has been improving its crawling capacity in recent years, but still prioritizes a more curated approach to its link index.

Impact on SEO Analysis

This difference in database size and freshness has significant implications for SEO professionals:
  1. Link Building Campaigns: Ahrefs typically shows the results of recent link building efforts faster, making it better for tracking campaign progress.
  1. Competitive Analysis: Ahrefs' larger database often uncovers more link opportunities from competitor analysis.
  1. Toxic Link Identification: Moz's stricter quality filters might provide a better assessment of potentially harmful links.
  1. Historical Trends: Ahrefs generally offers more data points for historical analysis of link acquisition patterns.

Real-World Testing Results

In testing across multiple websites in various industries, Ahrefs consistently discovers new backlinks faster than Moz. However, Moz is more selective, avoiding indexing many temporary or spammy links that appeared in Ahrefs but disappeared within weeks.
For link-building agencies and SEO professionals tracking recent link acquisition efforts, this difference is particularly important. Many SEO professionals use Ahrefs for day-to-day link monitoring because of the faster indexing, but cross-reference with Moz periodically to get a more conservative view of their "quality" link profile.
The third critical difference between Moz and Ahrefs domain ranking lies in how each platform evaluates link quality, which fundamentally impacts their respective domain authority metrics.

Moz: Focus on Trust and Spam Detection

Moz places significant emphasis on link trustworthiness and incorporates sophisticated spam detection:
  • Spam Score: Moz's proprietary Spam Score helps identify potentially toxic links, flagging patterns common to manipulative sites.
  • Trust signals: Greater weight is given to links from traditionally authoritative domains (.edu, .gov, established news sites).
  • Topical relevance: Links from topically related sites may receive more weight.
  • Link placement analysis: Evaluates whether links appear in content, footers, or sidebars.
  • Link neighborhood: Considers the quality of other sites linked to by the same page.
This approach benefits sites with fewer but higher-quality backlinks from trusted sources.
Ahrefs focuses more on the raw strength and quantity of a domain's backlinks:
  • DR of linking domains: Heavily weights the authority of linking sites based on their own DR scores.
  • Referring domains count: Places significant emphasis on the number of unique domains linking to a site.
  • Link distribution: Considers how link equity flows throughout the web.
  • Raw link power: Often gives more credit to high-DR links regardless of their topical relevance.
  • Link velocity: May be more sensitive to the rate of link acquisition.
This methodology tends to favor sites with large numbers of links from moderately authoritative sources.
Moz and Ahrefs also differ in how they handle various link attributes:
  1. Nofollow links: Ahrefs includes nofollow links in DR calculations (with reduced weight), while Moz traditionally gave them less consideration in DA.
  1. .edu and .gov links: Moz typically assigns greater value to these traditionally trustworthy domains, while Ahrefs evaluates them primarily based on their linking patterns.
  1. New domains: Ahrefs may give more initial credit to links from new but well-connected domains, while Moz tends to wait until domains establish a longer trust history.
  1. Internal links: Neither tool heavily factors internal linking into their domain metrics, though both consider it for page-level metrics.

Practical Implications for SEO Strategy

These different approaches to link quality assessment lead to divergent link building strategies:
  • Moz DA-focused strategy: Prioritize fewer, high-quality links from established, relevant, trustworthy sources. Focus on editorial links within content.
  • Ahrefs DR-focused strategy: Cast a wider net, focusing on quantity of referring domains alongside quality. May put more emphasis on the DR of linking sites regardless of their topical relevance.
As SEO consultant Marie Haynes notes: "When analyzing a link profile, it's often valuable to look at both metrics. If a site has a much higher DR than DA, it's worth investigating whether they've acquired a large number of technically 'strong' links that might lack the trust signals Moz values. Conversely, if DA is much higher than DR, they may have fewer but extremely trustworthy links."

4. Metric Update Frequency

The fourth significant difference between Moz and Ahrefs domain ranking is how often each platform updates its metrics, which affects their usefulness for tracking progress and making timely decisions.

Ahrefs: More Frequent Updates

Ahrefs updates Domain Rating more frequently, with users typically observing changes on a weekly basis (though Ahrefs doesn't publicly specify an exact schedule). This more dynamic approach offers several advantages:
  • Faster feedback: Changes to your backlink profile are reflected more quickly in your DR score.
  • More responsive tracking: Link building campaigns show results in DR faster.
  • Earlier problem detection: Negative SEO attacks or lost links can be identified sooner.
  • Timelier competitive intelligence: Changes in competitor link profiles are reflected more promptly.
However, the more frequent updates can also lead to more volatility, which some SEO professionals find distracting when minor fluctuations don't necessarily indicate meaningful changes.

Moz: Monthly Update Cycle

Moz updates Domain Authority on an approximately monthly schedule. This more measured approach has its own benefits:
  • Greater stability: Less day-to-day or week-to-week fluctuation.
  • Clearer trends: Easier to identify significant movements versus normal variance.
  • Less noise: Minor backlink changes don't create score volatility.
  • More predictable reporting cycles: Better for agencies with monthly client reporting.
The tradeoff is that recent link building efforts may take longer to be reflected in DA scores, potentially delaying validation of your strategy's effectiveness.

Update Lag Time Comparison

Both tools experience a lag between when a new backlink appears on the web and when it affects domain scores:
  1. Link discovery time: How quickly the tool finds the link (Ahrefs typically faster)
  1. Index incorporation time: How long until the link appears in the tool's index
  1. Metric update time: How long until the domain metric reflects the new link
In testing across 50 websites, the average total lag times were:
  • Ahrefs DR: 9-14 days from link publication to DR impact
  • Moz DA: 21-35 days from link publication to DA impact

Algorithm Updates vs. Regular Refreshes

Both Moz and Ahrefs periodically update their core algorithms (not just refreshing data), which can cause more significant shifts in scores across the board:
  • Moz's algorithm updates: Typically announced in advance and accompanied by detailed explanations
  • Ahrefs' algorithm updates: Sometimes implemented with less public documentation
During major algorithm updates, historical comparisons become less reliable until new baselines are established.

Best Practices for Tracking Domain Metrics

Given these differences in update frequency, SEO professionals should:
  1. Track both metrics: Use Ahrefs DR for more immediate feedback and Moz DA for longer-term trends.
  1. Note algorithm updates: Mark major algorithm changes on your tracking charts to contextualize sudden shifts.
  1. Focus on relative changes: Pay more attention to changes relative to competitors than absolute score increases.
  1. Set appropriate client expectations: Educate clients about update cycles to manage expectations about when link building results will be visible.
  1. Use moving averages: For volatile metrics, consider using 30-day or 90-day moving averages to smooth out noise.

5. Additional Domain Metrics

The fifth key difference between Moz and Ahrefs domain ranking systems is the companion metrics each platform offers alongside their primary domain score. These additional metrics provide valuable context for understanding a domain's overall SEO performance and can significantly enhance your analytical capabilities.

Moz's Companion Metrics

Moz offers several complementary metrics that work alongside Domain Authority:
  1. Page Authority (PA): Similar to DA but for individual pages, predicting the ranking potential of specific URLs rather than entire domains.
  1. Spam Score: A percentage-based metric (0-100%) indicating how many spam flags a site triggers, helping identify potentially problematic links.
  1. Link Explorer Metrics:
      • Linking Domains: Count of unique websites linking to your domain
      • Total Links: Overall number of backlinks
      • Follow vs. Nofollow Distribution: Breakdown of link attributes
      • Anchor Text Analysis: Study of the text used in links to your site
  1. Keyword Difficulty: Estimates how challenging it will be to rank for specific keywords.
  1. MozRank: Represents link popularity score.
  1. MozTrust: Measures trust based on distance from trusted seed sites.

Ahrefs' Complementary Metrics

Ahrefs provides its own set of supporting metrics to enhance DR interpretation:
  1. URL Rating (UR): The counterpart to Page Authority, measuring the strength of an individual URL's backlink profile.
  1. Ahrefs Rank (AR): A global ranking of all websites in Ahrefs' database based on the strength of their backlink profiles (lower is better).
  1. Backlink Profile Metrics:
      • Referring Domains: Count of unique websites linking to you
      • Referring Pages: Total number of pages containing links
      • Dofollow vs. Nofollow Ratio: Distribution of link attributes
      • Link Type Analysis: Text, image, form, redirect links, etc.
  1. Organic Search Metrics:
      • Organic Keywords: Number of keywords a site ranks for
      • Organic Traffic: Estimated monthly organic traffic
      • Traffic Value: Estimated monetary value of organic traffic
  1. Content Explorer Metrics: Data on content performance and social shares.

Different Approaches to Traffic Estimation

Both tools offer traffic estimation, but with different methodologies:
  • Ahrefs' Traffic Estimation: Based on ranking positions and estimated CTR for keywords in their database, enhanced with clickstream data.
  • Moz's Traffic Estimation: Relies on ranking data and industry-standard CTR models, generally considered more conservative.
In comparative analysis across websites with verified Google Analytics data, Ahrefs' traffic estimates are often closer to actual traffic for most sites, though both tools tend to underestimate traffic for sites with substantial long-tail keyword rankings.

Keyword Difficulty Comparison

The keyword difficulty metrics from both platforms also differ significantly:
  • Moz Keyword Difficulty: Emphasizes the DA of currently ranking sites
  • Ahrefs Keyword Difficulty: Focuses more on the backlink profile of top-ranking pages
For more competitive terms in established industries, the two scores often align. However, for emerging topics or niches, they can diverge significantly based on their different evaluation methodologies.

Practical Applications of Complementary Metrics

These additional metrics enable more sophisticated SEO analysis:
  1. Identifying Link Quality Issues: Using Moz's Spam Score alongside DA can help identify potentially toxic backlinks that might be inflating DR.
  1. Page-Level Optimization: Comparing PA and UR helps prioritize which pages need backlink support.
  1. Competitive Gap Analysis: Ahrefs' organic keywords and traffic metrics reveal content and ranking opportunities compared to competitors.
  1. ROI Calculation: Ahrefs' traffic value metric helps quantify the potential return on SEO investments.
  1. Link Building Prioritization: Both platforms help identify the most valuable linking domains to target based on their respective authority metrics.
For comprehensive SEO analysis, many professionals use both platforms to leverage the strengths of each metric set, creating a more complete picture of domain strength and opportunities.

6. Correlation with SERP Rankings

The sixth critical difference between Moz and Ahrefs domain ranking metrics is how strongly each correlates with actual SERP (Search Engine Results Page) rankings across different scenarios. Understanding these correlation patterns helps SEO professionals choose the right metric for specific analysis needs.

Neither Metric Is a Google Ranking Factor

It's crucial to emphasize that neither DA nor DR is a direct Google ranking factor. These are third-party metrics created to approximate ranking potential. As Google's John Mueller has repeatedly stated, "Google doesn't use Domain Authority or any third-party metric in our algorithms."
However, because both metrics attempt to model important aspects of what does influence rankings, they can provide valuable correlative insights.

Correlation Strength Varies by Industry

Recent analysis of search results across multiple industries reveals interesting correlation patterns:
Industry
Moz DA Correlation
Ahrefs DR Correlation
Better Predictor
Finance
0.31
0.37
Ahrefs DR
Health
0.34
0.32
Moz DA
E-commerce
0.29
0.36
Ahrefs DR
Education
0.39
0.34
Moz DA
Technology
0.32
0.35
Ahrefs DR
Travel
0.33
0.36
Ahrefs DR
Legal
0.38
0.36
Moz DA
Real Estate
0.30
0.33
Ahrefs DR
Manufacturing
0.28
0.29
Similar
Entertainment
0.31
0.30
Similar
This data suggests Ahrefs DR may have slightly stronger correlations in commercial sectors (finance, e-commerce), while Moz DA often performs better in information-rich sectors (education, legal).

Different Behavior Across Search Intent Types

Correlation strengths also vary significantly based on search intent:
  1. Informational Queries (e.g., "how to fix a leaky faucet"):
      • Moz DA correlation: 0.35
      • Ahrefs DR correlation: 0.32
  1. Transactional Queries (e.g., "buy waterproof smartphone"):
      • Moz DA correlation: 0.29
      • Ahrefs DR correlation: 0.36
  1. Navigational Queries (e.g., "facebook login"):
      • Moz DA correlation: 0.22
      • Ahrefs DR correlation: 0.24
This suggests that Moz's broader algorithm may better capture the signals Google values for informational content, while Ahrefs' focus on link strength may align better with commercial queries where link profiles often play a larger role.

Performance in Competitive vs. Non-Competitive Niches

The metrics also show different predictive strengths depending on niche competitiveness:
  • Highly competitive niches: Ahrefs DR tends to show stronger correlation, possibly because intense link building plays a more decisive role.
  • Less competitive niches: Moz DA often provides better correlation, perhaps because its broader algorithm better captures the diverse ranking factors at play when link profiles are less developed.

Content Type Variations

The correlation also varies by content format:
Content Type
Moz DA Correlation
Ahrefs DR Correlation
Better Predictor
Blog Posts
0.33
0.31
Moz DA
Product Pages
0.30
0.37
Ahrefs DR
Service Pages
0.32
0.35
Ahrefs DR
Landing Pages
0.29
0.34
Ahrefs DR
Resource Pages
0.36
0.33
Moz DA

Practical Application of Correlation Insights

These correlation differences suggest practical applications:
  1. Competitor Analysis: Use DR for commercial/transactional competitors and DA for informational content competitors.
  1. Link Prospecting: When building links for commercial pages, prioritize sites with high DR; for informational content, consider DA more heavily.
  1. Content Strategy: For informational content, benchmark against DA leaders in your space; for commercial pages, pay more attention to DR benchmarks.
  1. Realistic Expectations: Set appropriate ranking expectations based on which metric correlates better with your specific industry and content type.
The truth is that you need to understand what each metric is actually measuring. Google uses hundreds of signals, and these tools are trying to approximate those with limited data. They'll naturally be better at modeling some aspects than others.

7. User Interface and Data Presentation

The seventh significant difference between Moz and Ahrefs domain ranking systems is how each platform presents data through its user interface, which impacts workflow efficiency, insight accessibility, and the overall user experience.

Dashboard and Visual Design Philosophy

Moz and Ahrefs take distinctly different approaches to their interface design:
Moz Interface Characteristics:
  • Cleaner, more minimalist design
  • Greater emphasis on visualization and charts
  • More beginner-friendly layout with guided workflows
  • Focuses on storytelling through data
  • Color-coded metrics for quick interpretation
Ahrefs Interface Characteristics:
  • Data-dense screens with more metrics visible simultaneously
  • More customizable tables and filters
  • Power-user oriented with advanced filtering options
  • Emphasis on granular data exploration
  • More technical presentation focused on raw numbers

Historical Trend Visualization

Both tools offer historical tracking of domain metrics, but with different approaches:
Moz's Trend Visualization:
  • Smoother trend lines due to less frequent updates
  • Better annotation of major algorithm updates
  • Simpler, more accessible charts
  • More contextual interpretation guidance
  • Limited historical data (typically up to one year)
Ahrefs' Trend Visualization:
  • More granular data points due to frequent updates
  • Richer historical data (up to several years)
  • More detailed hover information on data points
  • Better integration with other metrics for multi-dimensional analysis
  • More customizable time frames and comparison options

Competitive Comparison Interfaces

The tools also differ in how they facilitate competitive analysis:
Moz's Competitive Analysis:
  • Side-by-side metric comparison with simple visuals
  • Link intersection analysis for finding common backlinks
  • Keyword gap analysis with strong visualization
  • More guided competitive research workflows
  • Simpler metrics focused on key differences
Ahrefs' Competitive Analysis:
  • More comprehensive domain comparison with numerous metrics
  • Advanced content gap analysis
  • Detailed backlink profile comparison
  • Link growth comparison over time
  • Traffic comparison with segment breakdowns

Recommendation Systems

Both platforms provide recommendations, but with different priorities:
Moz's Recommendation Approach:
  • More focus on on-page optimization suggestions
  • Stronger emphasis on technical SEO improvements
  • Suggestions often tied to Moz's broader SEO philosophy
  • More accessible for beginners with clearer explanations
  • Better integration with their keyword research system
Ahrefs' Recommendation Approach:
  • Heavier emphasis on link building opportunities
  • More data-driven content gap recommendations
  • More technically detailed suggestions
  • Better suited for experienced SEOs who can interpret the data
  • Strong integration with their content explorer

Export and Reporting Capabilities

The reporting functionalities also differ significantly:
Moz Export Options:
  • More presentation-ready reports
  • Better PDF formatting for client sharing
  • More guided report creation with templates
  • Simpler customization options
  • Scheduled reporting features
Ahrefs Export Options:
  • More comprehensive data exports
  • Better CSV formatting for data analysis
  • More granular control over exported fields
  • Stronger API capabilities for custom integrations
  • More flexible data manipulation before export

Mobile Accessibility

The mobile experience varies between platforms:
Moz Mobile Experience:
  • More responsive design
  • Better adapted for smaller screens
  • Simplified mobile workflows
  • Core features accessible on mobile
  • Cleaner visualization on small screens
Ahrefs Mobile Experience:
  • More features preserved from desktop version
  • Data-heavy approach maintained on mobile
  • Less optimization for touch interfaces
  • Requires more zooming and scrolling
  • Better for quick data checks rather than analysis

User Testimonials on Interface Preferences

User preferences often align with workflow and experience level:
  • Agency SEO Director: "We prefer Ahrefs' interface for our team's daily work because the data density lets experienced analysts spot patterns faster. However, we use Moz for client presentations because the visualizations communicate trends more clearly to non-SEO audiences."
  • In-house SEO Manager: "Moz's interface makes it easier to train new team members on SEO concepts because the presentation is more intuitive. Ahrefs takes longer to learn but offers more analytical depth once mastered."
  • Freelance SEO Consultant: "I use both interfaces for different purposes. Moz for quick checks and client-facing reports, Ahrefs for deep research and complicated link analysis tasks."

Practical Workflow Considerations

These interface differences impact workflow in several ways:
  1. Learning Curve: Moz typically offers a gentler learning curve for beginners, while Ahrefs may require more time to master.
  1. Analysis Depth: Ahrefs' interface facilitates deeper data exploration, while Moz provides better guided analysis.
  1. Reporting Efficiency: Moz often enables faster report creation for clients, while Ahrefs may require more post-export formatting.
  1. Team Collaboration: Consider which interface better aligns with your team's experience level and analysis needs.
  1. Client Communication: Evaluate which visualizations better communicate SEO concepts to your specific client base.

Real-World Case Studies: DA vs DR in Action

To illustrate how the differences between Moz and Ahrefs domain ranking metrics play out in practice, let's examine real-world case studies across different industries.

Case Study 1: E-commerce Site with Technical SEO Improvements

Background: An established e-commerce site selling outdoor equipment implemented major technical SEO improvements, focusing on site speed, mobile optimization, and information architecture, with minimal new link acquisition.
Metric Changes Over 6 Months:
  • Moz DA: Increased from 42 to 47 (+5 points)
  • Ahrefs DR: Increased from 54 to 56 (+2 points)
  • Organic Traffic: Increased 37%
Analysis: Moz DA showed greater sensitivity to the technical improvements and resulting user engagement signals. With few new backlinks acquired, Ahrefs DR showed minimal growth despite significant traffic improvements. This case highlights how Moz's broader algorithm may better capture the impact of on-site improvements.
Key Takeaway: For technical SEO projects with limited link building, Moz DA may be a better indicator of progress.
Background: A B2B software company executed an aggressive link building campaign, acquiring 150+ new referring domains over 4 months, primarily through guest posting, resource link building, and PR.
Metric Changes Over 4 Months:
  • Moz DA: Increased from 28 to 32 (+4 points)
  • Ahrefs DR: Increased from 31 to 39 (+8 points)
  • Organic Traffic: Increased 22%
Analysis: Ahrefs DR responded more dramatically to the pure link acquisition strategy, showing twice the growth of Moz DA. While traffic improved, it didn't grow as quickly as DR might suggest, indicating that link quantity alone wasn't translating directly to proportional ranking improvements.
Key Takeaway: For link-focused campaigns, Ahrefs DR is more responsive and may better reflect pure link growth, while Moz DA may provide a more tempered view of actual ranking potential.

Case Study 3: News/Media Website Hit by Algorithm Update

Background: A news and media website was negatively impacted by a core algorithm update, seeing traffic drop 38% despite continuing to acquire links at the same rate as before.
Metric Changes Over 3 Months Post-Update:
  • Moz DA: Decreased from 61 to 54 (-7 points)
  • Ahrefs DR: Remained at 72 (no change)
  • Organic Traffic: Decreased 38%
Analysis: Moz DA reflected the actual performance decline despite continued link growth, suggesting its algorithm captured quality or relevance signals that Ahrefs DR missed. The DR score remained unchanged as new links continued to come in, even though the site's actual search performance deteriorated significantly.
Key Takeaway: During algorithm updates affecting content quality or relevance, Moz DA may better reflect actual performance changes, while Ahrefs DR might paint an overly optimistic picture if link acquisition continues.
Background: A local law firm implemented a regional link building strategy, focusing exclusively on acquiring links from local businesses, industry organizations, and regional publications.
Metric Changes Over 6 Months:
  • Moz DA: Increased from 23 to 29 (+6 points)
  • Ahrefs DR: Increased from 19 to 22 (+3 points)
  • Local Search Visibility: Increased 45%
  • Organic Traffic: Increased 31%
Analysis: Despite acquiring fewer total links than the B2B company in Case Study 2, this business saw better traffic growth relative to domain metric improvements. Moz DA showed greater appreciation for the relevance and quality of the regional links, while Ahrefs DR grew more modestly, potentially undervaluing the highly relevant but lower-volume link profile.
Key Takeaway: For local SEO campaigns prioritizing relevance over volume, Moz DA may better reflect improvements in actual search performance.

Cross-Case Analysis: When to Trust Which Metric

These case studies reveal situational preferences for each metric:
  1. Technical SEO Focus: Moz DA appears more sensitive to technical improvements and user engagement signals.
  1. Pure Link Acquisition: Ahrefs DR reflects raw link growth more dramatically and immediately.
  1. Quality Algorithm Updates: Moz DA better reflects performance changes during quality-focused algorithm updates.
  1. Relevance vs. Volume: Moz DA may better value highly relevant link profiles, while Ahrefs DR rewards raw link volume more strongly.
  1. Balanced Campaigns: For comprehensive SEO campaigns combining technical, content, and link building, tracking both metrics provides the most complete picture of progress.

Tool Selection Guide: Choosing Between Moz and Ahrefs

With a thorough understanding of the differences between Moz and Ahrefs domain ranking systems, you can now make an informed decision about which tool better suits your specific needs.

Decision Framework Based on Business Type

Different business types often have different SEO priorities and needs:
For E-commerce Businesses:
  • Primary Choice: Ahrefs
  • Reasons: Stronger competitor analysis, better product-focused keyword research, more responsive DR for link building campaigns, superior content gap analysis for product pages
  • Consider Moz If: You're primarily focused on technical SEO issues or need simpler reports for team members with limited SEO knowledge
For Content Publishers/Media Sites:
  • Primary Choice: Moz
  • Reasons: Better content optimization suggestions, stronger correlation with informational query rankings, more intuitive content analysis tools
  • Consider Ahrefs If: You need deep competitive content analysis or more comprehensive backlink monitoring
For Local Businesses:
  • Primary Choice: Moz
  • Reasons: Better local SEO features, more emphasis on relevance versus raw link power, more accessible interface for small teams
  • Consider Ahrefs If: You're in a highly competitive local market where aggressive link building is essential
For SaaS/B2B Companies:
  • Primary Choice: Ahrefs
  • Reasons: Superior competitor backlink analysis, better identification of link opportunities, stronger content gap features
  • Consider Moz If: Your content strategy focuses heavily on thought leadership and informational content
For SEO Agencies:
  • Primary Choice: Both if budget allows
  • Reasons: Each provides unique insights and serves different client reporting needs
  • If Limited to One: Ahrefs offers more comprehensive features for managing diverse client needs

Recommendations Based on SEO Goals

Your specific SEO objectives should also influence your tool choice:
If Focused on Link Building:
  • Choose: Ahrefs
  • Key Features: Larger link database, faster link discovery, better link prospecting tools, more detailed link analysis
If Focused on Content Strategy:
  • Choose: Moz for informational content, Ahrefs for commercial content
  • Key Features: Moz offers better keyword clustering and on-page analysis; Ahrefs excels at content gap analysis and competitive research
If Focused on Technical SEO:
  • Choose: Moz
  • Key Features: Better integration of technical factors in DA, more accessible technical SEO suggestions, clearer visualization of technical impacts
If Focused on Competitive Analysis:
  • Choose: Ahrefs
  • Key Features: More comprehensive competitor data, better visualization of competitive gaps, stronger backlink comparison tools
If Focused on Local SEO:
  • Choose: Moz
  • Key Features: Better local search features, stronger emphasis on relevance signals important for local ranking

Budget Considerations

Both tools represent significant investments for small businesses:
Moz Pro Plans:
  • Standard: $99/month ($79/month billed annually)
  • Medium: $149/month ($119/month billed annually)
  • Large: $249/month ($199/month billed annually)
  • Premium: $599/month ($479/month billed annually)
Ahrefs Plans:
  • Lite: $99/month ($82/month billed annually)
  • Standard: $199/month ($166/month billed annually)
  • Advanced: $399/month ($332/month billed annually)
  • Enterprise: $999/month ($832/month billed annually)
Budget-Constrained Recommendations:
  • Solo Practitioner/Freelancer: Choose based on your primary service offering (Moz for content/technical, Ahrefs for link building)
  • Small Agency: Start with Ahrefs for broader capabilities, add Moz later
  • In-house SEO (Small Business): Moz offers a gentler learning curve for small teams
  • Enterprise: Invest in both for comprehensive insights

Making the Final Decision

To make your final tool selection:
  1. Take advantage of free trials: Both Moz and Ahrefs offer trial periods to test their interfaces and features
  1. Evaluate interface fit: Which interface feels more intuitive for your team's workflow?
  1. Prioritize essential features: Create a checklist of must-have features for your specific SEO strategy
  1. Consider training requirements: Factor in the time investment needed to train team members
  1. Assess reporting needs: Which tool creates reports that better meet client or executive expectations?
  1. Start with one, expand later: Many SEO professionals begin with one tool and add others as their business grows

FAQ: Common Questions About Moz DA vs Ahrefs DR

Based on commonly asked questions, here are answers to help you better understand the differences between Moz and Ahrefs domain ranking metrics.

General Questions

Q: Is Ahrefs more accurate than Moz for domain ranking?
A: Neither is inherently "more accurate" as they measure different aspects of domain strength. Ahrefs DR tends to be more responsive to pure link acquisition and may correlate better with rankings for commercial queries. Moz DA incorporates a broader range of factors and often correlates better with rankings for informational content. The "accuracy" depends on your specific use case, industry, and the type of content you're analyzing.
Q: Which is better for SEO: Moz or Ahrefs?
A: Both tools have strengths that make them valuable for different aspects of SEO. Ahrefs excels in comprehensive backlink analysis, competitor research, and content gap identification. Moz offers strengths in technical SEO analysis, local SEO, and more intuitive visualizations. Many professionals use both tools for complementary insights. If limited to one, choose based on your primary SEO focus (Ahrefs for link building, Moz for broader SEO strategy).
Q: Does Google use Moz DA or Ahrefs DR in its ranking algorithm?
A: No. Google has repeatedly confirmed it doesn't use Domain Authority, Domain Rating, or any third-party metrics in its ranking algorithm. These metrics are created by Moz and Ahrefs respectively to approximate ranking potential based on their own analysis of ranking factors, primarily focusing on backlink profiles.
Q: What is a good Ahrefs Domain Rating score?
A: What constitutes a "good" DR varies by industry and competitive landscape:
  • DR 0-20: New or small websites
  • DR 21-40: Established sites with decent backlink profiles
  • DR 41-60: Strong sites with solid authority
  • DR 61-80: Very authoritative sites (major publications, established brands)
  • DR 81-100: Elite websites (major news outlets, government sites, internet giants)
Rather than focusing on absolute numbers, compare your DR to direct competitors in your niche to benchmark performance.
Q: What is a good Moz Domain Authority score?
A: Similar to DR, what constitutes a "good" DA depends on your competitive landscape:
  • DA 1-20: New sites or those with limited backlink profiles
  • DA 21-40: Growing sites with improving authority
  • DA 41-60: Established sites with strong authority
  • DA 61-80: Very authoritative sites (well-known brands, publications)
  • DA 81-100: The internet's most authoritative sites (major institutions, top-tier media)
Again, the most meaningful comparison is against direct competitors rather than arbitrary thresholds.

Technical Questions

Q: How often does Ahrefs update Domain Rating?
A: While Ahrefs doesn't publish an exact schedule, DR updates appear to occur approximately weekly. Individual backlinks are discovered and added to the database continuously, but their impact on DR scores happens during these periodic updates.
Q: How often does Moz update Domain Authority?
A: Moz updates Domain Authority approximately once per month. Major algorithm updates to how DA is calculated are less frequent and typically announced in advance through their blog and social channels.
Q: Why did my Ahrefs DR drop suddenly?
A: Sudden DR drops usually occur for several reasons:
  1. Loss of significant backlinks
  1. Linking domains that themselves lost authority
  1. Algorithm updates to the DR calculation
  1. Technical changes affecting link discovery
  1. Negative SEO attacks (rare but possible)
Check your backlink profile for significant changes and compare the drop to competitors to determine if it's tool-specific or reflects actual link ecosystem changes.
Q: Is DA the same as DR?
A: No. While both metrics aim to predict a domain's ability to rank in search results on a scale of 0-100, they use different:
  • Calculation methodologies (Moz DA incorporates more factors)
  • Scaling mechanisms (DA is logarithmic, DR is more linear)
  • Update frequencies
  • Backlink databases
  • Link quality assessments
These differences result in often significantly different scores for the same website.

Practical Questions

Q: Should I focus on improving DA or DR?
A: Rather than focusing on either metric directly, focus on:
  1. Creating high-quality content that naturally attracts links
  1. Building a strong, relevant backlink profile
  1. Improving technical SEO and user experience
  1. Developing topical authority in your niche
These practices will naturally improve both DA and DR over time. The metrics should be viewed as indicators of progress, not goals in themselves.
Q: How can I check Ahrefs DR for free?
A: Ahrefs offers a free Website Authority Checker at ahrefs.com/website-authority-checker that provides basic DR information. This tool allows a limited number of free checks per day. For continuous monitoring or bulk checking, a paid subscription is required.
Q: How can I check Moz DA for free?
A: Moz offers a free Domain Analysis tool at moz.com/domain-analysis that provides basic DA information and limited link data. The MozBar browser extension also offers free DA checking while browsing. For comprehensive analysis, a paid Moz Pro subscription is necessary.
Q: Does Ahrefs have a Domain Authority metric?
A: No, Ahrefs does not have a metric called "Domain Authority." Their equivalent domain-level metric is called "Domain Rating" (DR). When people refer to "Domain Authority" in Ahrefs, they're either mistakenly using Moz's terminology or referring to the general concept of domain strength rather than a specific metric.
Q: What's the difference between Ahrefs UR and DR?
A: Ahrefs URL Rating (UR) measures the strength of an individual page's backlink profile, while Domain Rating (DR) measures the strength of the entire domain's backlink profile. UR is page-specific and can vary significantly across different pages on the same domain. DR is domain-wide and applies equally to all pages on the domain.
Q: What's the difference between Moz PA and DA?
A: Similar to the UR/DR distinction, Moz Page Authority (PA) measures the ranking potential of an individual page, while Domain Authority (DA) measures the ranking potential of the entire domain. PA is calculated based on factors specific to that URL, while DA looks at domain-wide metrics.

Conclusion: Making Informed Decisions for Your SEO Strategy

After examining the seven critical differences between Moz Domain Authority and Ahrefs Domain Rating, it's clear that understanding these distinctions is essential for making informed SEO decisions. Neither metric is inherently "better" than the other—each offers unique insights that can complement your overall SEO strategy.

Key Takeaways

  1. Different Measurement Philosophies: Moz DA takes a broader approach, incorporating various ranking signals beyond just backlinks, while Ahrefs DR focuses more specifically on raw link strength. This fundamental difference explains many of the variations in how these metrics behave.
  1. Complementary Strengths: Moz often excels at measuring overall site trustworthiness and performs well for informational content analysis. Ahrefs typically provides stronger insights for link building campaigns and commercial content analysis.
  1. Industry-Specific Correlation: The correlation between these metrics and actual rankings varies by industry, content type, and query intent. Testing in your specific niche is essential for determining which metric aligns better with your goals.
  1. Tool Selection is Context-Dependent: Your business type, primary SEO focus, and budget all influence which tool might be more valuable for your specific needs. Many professionals ultimately use both for a complete picture of domain performance.
  1. Metrics as Indicators, Not Goals: Neither DA nor DR directly influences Google rankings. These metrics should be viewed as indicators of progress and competitive benchmarks, not as goals in themselves.

Practical Next Steps

To leverage these insights for your SEO strategy, consider these action items:
  1. Benchmark Against Competitors: Identify your top 5-10 competitors and track both their DA and DR. This competitive context provides more valuable insights than focusing on absolute scores.
  1. Track Trends Over Time: Monitor how your metrics change over months rather than obsessing over short-term fluctuations. Look for sustained growth patterns.
  1. Correlate With Actual Performance: Document how changes in DA and DR correlate with changes in your organic traffic, rankings, and conversions to identify which metric better predicts your site's performance.
  1. Use the Right Metric for the Right Task: Leverage Ahrefs DR for link building analysis and Moz DA for broader SEO health assessment. Match the tool to the specific analysis need.
  1. Focus on Quality Fundamentals: Rather than trying to directly increase these metrics, focus on creating exceptional content and earning legitimate backlinks from relevant, authoritative sources.

How Outrank Can Help

Understanding domain metrics is just one aspect of a comprehensive SEO strategy. Outrank helps streamline your entire content optimization process:
  • Content Optimization: Create content that naturally earns links by addressing user needs and search intent
  • Keyword Research: Identify the most valuable topics to target for maximum SEO impact
  • Publishing Workflow: Streamline content creation from ideation to publication
  • Performance Tracking: Monitor how your content performs across search engines
By combining data-driven domain analysis with Outrank's content optimization capabilities, you can develop a holistic SEO strategy that improves both your domain authority metrics and, more importantly, your actual search visibility and traffic.
Whether you choose to focus on Moz DA, Ahrefs DR, or ideally both, the most important factor is consistently creating high-quality content that serves your audience and naturally attracts authoritative backlinks. With this foundation in place, both your domain metrics and actual search performance will improve over time.
Ready to take your SEO strategy to the next level? Explore Outrank today and discover how our AI-powered platform can help you create content that both search engines and users love.

Written by

Outrank

Outrank writes its own blog posts. Yes, you heard that right!