Zero-click searches415 sites · 15 months of Search Console data
Impressions doubled. Clicks didn’t.
We followed 415 sites in Google Search Console for 15 months. First, Google stopped counting the bots, and click-through rate jumped. Then AI answers took the whole gain back. Since October 2025, the median site’s impressions grew 2.18×. Its clicks grew 22%.
Original research by the Outrank team · Published October 1, 2026
2.18×
Impressions
Median site, October 2025 → August 2026
+22%
Clicks
59.5% of sites grew clicks at all
−40%
Click-through rate
79% of sites lost CTR
−31%
CTR at an unchanged position
129 sites whose ranking did not move
The gap
Since Google removed the bots, impressions doubled and clicks rose a fifth
Median impressions and clicks per site, indexed to October 2025 (1×), the first full month without scraper traffic. 415 sites, the same ones every month.
| Period | Impressions | Clicks |
|---|---|---|
| Oct ’25 | 1.00× | 1.00× |
| Nov ’25 | 1.13× | 0.97× |
| Dec ’25 | 1.32× | 0.92× |
| Jan ’26 | 1.66× | 1.11× |
| Feb ’26 | 1.63× | 1.09× |
| Mar ’26 | 1.86× | 1.16× |
| Apr ’26 | 1.71× | 1.09× |
| May ’26 | 1.77× | 1.11× |
| Jun ’26 | 1.70× | 1.15× |
| Jul ’26 | 1.83× | 1.23× |
| Aug ’26 | 2.18× | 1.22× |
Source: Google Search Console data connected to Outrank, October 2025 to August 2026.
The two lines leave October together and never meet again. By January the median site was being shown two-thirds more often than in October, with barely more clicks. By August it was shown 2.18× as often and clicked 1.22× as often. The space between the lines is the zero-click era: Google showing these pages more than ever, increasingly inside an answer that does not need the visit.
This is not a story about sites failing. These sites kept publishing and kept gaining visibility. The exchange rate between visibility and visits is what moved.
Act one · September 2025
A third of your impressions were bots, and Google deleted them in 72 hours
Daily impressions and clicks for 1,763 sites, each indexed to its own late-August average.
| Period | Impressions | Clicks |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 25 | 1.02× | 1.08× |
| Aug 26 | 1.04× | 1.08× |
| Aug 27 | 1.03× | 1.06× |
| Aug 28 | 1.03× | 1.05× |
| Aug 29 | 0.98× | 0.92× |
| Aug 30 | 0.96× | 0.72× |
| Aug 31 | 1.00× | 0.81× |
| Sep 1 | 1.10× | 1.00× |
| Sep 2 | 1.11× | 1.09× |
| Sep 3 | 1.04× | 1.08× |
| Sep 4 | 1.04× | 1.07× |
| Sep 5 | 1.00× | 0.97× |
| Sep 6 | 0.96× | 0.76× |
| Sep 7 | 0.99× | 0.86× |
| Sep 8 | 1.07× | 1.16× |
| Sep 9 | 1.03× | 1.16× |
| Sep 10 | 0.91× | 1.08× |
| Sep 11 | 0.84× | 1.05× |
| Sep 12 | 0.65× | 0.94× |
| Sep 13 | 0.48× | 0.72× |
| Sep 14 | 0.53× | 0.82× |
| Sep 15 | 0.66× | 1.15× |
| Sep 16 | 0.64× | 1.15× |
| Sep 17 | 0.63× | 1.11× |
| Sep 18 | 0.65× | 1.08× |
| Sep 19 | 0.60× | 0.94× |
| Sep 20 | 0.54× | 0.73× |
| Sep 21 | 0.56× | 0.83× |
| Sep 22 | 0.65× | 1.13× |
| Sep 23 | 0.63× | 1.12× |
| Sep 24 | 0.64× | 1.11× |
| Sep 25 | 0.62× | 1.09× |
| Sep 26 | 0.60× | 0.96× |
| Sep 27 | 0.55× | 0.73× |
| Sep 28 | 0.57× | 0.83× |
| Sep 29 | 0.67× | 1.14× |
| Sep 30 | 0.68× | 1.13× |
Source: Google Search Console data connected to Outrank, August 25 to September 30, 2025.
Between September 10 and 13, 2025, Google stopped honoring the &num=100 parameter that rank trackers and AI scrapers used to pull a hundred results in one request. Each of those scraped pages had been counted as an impression for every site on it, mostly deep in the results where no human ever looks.
Across 1,503 sites the median site lost 33% of its impressions in days. Clicks moved +4%. Average position improved from 29 to 13 for 99% of sites without a single ranking changing. If you celebrated a ranking jump that week, it was not one.
Act two · October 2025 to August 2026
Click-through rate jumped 56%, then AI answers took all of it back
Median click-through rate per site, by month.
| Period | Median click-through rate |
|---|---|
| Jun ’25 | 0.83% |
| Jul ’25 | 0.78% |
| Aug ’25 | 0.70% |
| Sep ’25 | 1.03% |
| Oct ’25 | 1.19% |
| Nov ’25 | 1.02% |
| Dec ’25 | 0.81% |
| Jan ’26 | 0.78% |
| Feb ’26 | 0.72% |
| Mar ’26 | 0.71% |
| Apr ’26 | 0.73% |
| May ’26 | 0.65% |
| Jun ’26 | 0.72% |
| Jul ’26 | 0.84% |
| Aug ’26 | 0.73% |
Source: Google Search Console data connected to Outrank, 415 sites.
Cleaned of bot traffic, October 2025 showed the real click-through rate of these sites for the first time: a median of 1.19%. It slid to 0.71% by March and never recovered. By August 2026 the median site’s CTR was 40% below October, and 79% of sites were down.
Zoom out and the year nets to nothing: the median site ended August 2026 with a click-through rate within 1% of August 2025 (1.01×). Bots inflated impressions before; AI answers deflate clicks now.
The obvious objection is that these sites publish a lot, and new pages start on page two where nobody clicks. So we isolated the 129 sites whose average position barely moved (within two places). Their CTR still fell 31%, and 77.5% of them lost CTR. Same rankings, fewer clicks.
By ranking
Ranking well softens the blow. It does not stop it.
Click-through rate in August 2026 compared with October 2025 (1× means unchanged), by the site’s average position in October.
Average position under 10: 0.70× · 118 sites · Impressions ×2, clicks ×1.29 Hover a bar for details.
| Average position under 10 | 0.70× | 118 |
|---|---|---|
| Average position 10 to 20 | 0.56× | 179 |
| Average position over 20 | 0.58× | 118 |
Source: 415 sites, median per group.
By industry
Marketing & advertising lost 52% of its click-through. Home & garden lost 20%.
Click-through rate in August 2026 compared with October 2025, by niche. Niches with at least 12 sites.
Marketing & advertising: 0.48× · 41 sites · 85% of sites lost CTR Hover a bar for details.
| Marketing & advertising | 0.48× | 41 |
|---|---|---|
| Real estate | 0.52× | 16 |
| SaaS & tech | 0.53× | 49 |
| Legal & compliance | 0.54× | 15 |
| Finance & fintech | 0.54× | 18 |
| Education & e-learning | 0.57× | 14 |
| Health & wellness | 0.63× | 28 |
| E-commerce & retail | 0.69× | 26 |
| Fashion & beauty | 0.75× | 14 |
| B2B services | 0.75× | 38 |
| Home & garden | 0.80× | 43 |
Source: 415 sites, median per niche.
The niches that lost most are the ones AI answers best: marketing advice, software comparisons, legal and financial explainers. Questions with a text answer get answered on the results page. Home and garden, B2B services and fashion held up better because people still want to see the product, the provider or the photo. If your niche is at the top of this list, a traffic plan built on informational articles alone is already out of date.
Our take
Stop reporting click-through rate. In 2026, an impression is Google reading your page to answer someone, and that is the new top of the funnel.
The click did not disappear. 59.5% of these sites still grew clicks, because they kept publishing. What changed is the exchange rate: you now need about twice the visibility for the same traffic. Teams that keep judging SEO by CTR will cut the very content that feeds AI answers about their brand.
Read the AI citation study for what gets you quoted, and the content format study for what still earns the click.
- 01
Measure visibility, not just clicks
Track impressions and AI citations next to clicks. Ahrefs, Semrush and others now count how often assistants cite your domain.
- 02
Be the page AI has to cite
Original numbers, first-hand experience and precise answers. Our AI citation study shows AI cites the sites Google already shows.
- 03
Build the click AI cannot take
Calculators, tools and comparisons still get clicked. Pages that only explain get summarized.
The case against
4 reasons to discount these numbers
Every dataset has blind spots. These are ours, stated plainly.
These sites publish constantly
Outrank customers add pages every day, and new pages start low where few people click. That pulls CTR down on its own. It is why we checked sites with a steady average position: they still lost a third of their CTR.
Seasonality
October and August are different months. Many sites slow down in summer. The decline is spread over ten months though, not concentrated in July and August.
Google changes how it counts
Search Console counts AI Overview and AI Mode appearances as impressions with their own position rules. Part of the impression growth is new surfaces being counted, which is exactly the point: those surfaces rarely send a click.
One kind of site
These are 415 sites that use Outrank and kept Search Console connected for 15 months. Big publishers and brands may behave differently.
Methodology
How we ran the numbers
- Data: daily clicks, impressions and average position from Google Search Console for the 4,828 sites connected to Outrank. Search Console keeps 16 months of history.
- Panel: 415 sites with at least 25 days of data and 1,000 impressions in every month from June 2025 to August 2026. Every chart and headline number uses the same sites.
- September 2025 change: 1,503 sites with 5,000+ impressions between August 15 and September 9, 2025, compared with September 20 to October 15. The daily chart uses 1,763 sites, each indexed to its own late-August daily average.
- Medians: every number is the median site, not a total, so a few very large sites cannot drive the result. Average position is weighted by impressions.
Cite this study
Outrank (October 1, 2026). Zero-click searches in 2026: impressions doubled, clicks didn’t. Search Console data from 415 sites. https://www.outrank.so/case-studies/zero-click-searches
Journalists, researchers and bloggers are welcome to quote these numbers and screenshot the charts with a link back to this page.


